Flaviopédia Português
Brazil for Women

Easier reporting

technology will prevent violence from happening

Proposes integrating reporting channels into a rapid-response platform, creating a national risk-assessment system and monitoring higher-risk aggressors with ankle bracelets.

In the program: [p. 18, 19] · Translated by Flaviopédia from the official Portuguese text; the Portuguese quote is authoritative. Read the original in Portuguese

What the program says

Whoever lives in fear cannot wait. We will modernize and integrate the reporting channels, bringing together Ligue 180 (the national helpline for women), the online police stations, the emergency button and the monitoring centers in a smart rapid-response platform. Through the “ClarIA” chat it will be possible to file a police report, request a protective order and receive guidance and support. We will implement a national risk-assessment system, so that each report receives a response proportional to the level of the threat, prioritizing the most serious cases. And we will monitor with electronic ankle bracelets the highest-risk aggressors under protective orders, immediately alerting the authorities and the victim in the event of a breach of the court order or an improper approach. [p. 18, 19]

In plain language

  • The program proposes modernizing and integrating the reporting channels into a single rapid-response platform. The text cites Ligue 180, the online police stations, the emergency button and the monitoring centers.
  • Through the “ClarIA” chat it would be possible to file a police report, request a protective order and receive guidance and support.
  • It provides for a national risk-assessment system, so that each report is handled according to the level of the threat, with priority for the most serious cases.
  • It proposes monitoring with an electronic ankle bracelet the highest-risk aggressors under protective orders, with an immediate alert to the authorities and the victim if the court order is breached or if there is an improper approach.

What is not in the program

  • It does not define the criteria of the risk-assessment system or who carries out the assessment.
  • It does not say who decides which aggressors would be monitored with ankle bracelets or how many there would be.
  • It does not detail who operates the integrated platform or how the channels cited would be unified.
  • It gives no timeline, cost or source of funding.